๐Ÿšš gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 356+ reviews
Vintage โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Starbucks "Chicago" mug

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.2 out of 5 (356 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$10
$16.67
Sale
โœ“ no-cost delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

fancy fresh still has the original price tag on it

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt delivery
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Starbucks "Chicago" mug

fancy brand-new still has the original price tag on it​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1773152

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Mugs

Original Price: $16.67 USD

Sale Price: $10 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9874 reviews
JM
Jessica Moore โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Aurora, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
exceptional
Quality is decent. The Starbucks "Chicago" mug meets expectations.
19 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Tulsa, OK
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Brilliant Starbucks "Chicago" mug
Read the reviews before buying the Starbucks "Chicago" mug and they were right - terrific product!
38 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Raleigh, NC
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Simply incredible
Personally, the Starbucks "Chicago" mug performs as expected so Iโ€™m okay with it.
9 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Tampa, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
marvelous quality
After a few days, the Starbucks "Chicago" mug feels okay which is good enough. Arrived on time.
MW
Michelle Walker โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Portland, OR
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
leading purchase ever
Personally, it works as described which is good enough.
11 people found this helpful