🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 939+ reviews
Kids βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (939 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20
$33.33
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

impeccable for summer, runs fancy 6/9m

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt delivery
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper

outstanding for summer, runs fancy 6/9m

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1015359

Category: Kids > Girls Dresses > Girls 0-24 mos

Original Price: $33.33 USD

Sale Price: $20 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3894 reviews
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
certainly impressed
express delivery and solid Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper.
40 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading purchase ever
After some use, it is uncomplicated to use so I’m okay with it. Nothing fancy.
37 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
In daily use, the Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper works as described and it’s fine overall.
28 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
only what I wanted
the Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper is practical which is good enough.
33 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Charlotte, NC

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable purchase
After several use, the Vintage Oshkosh 3/6m bubble romper works fine so it’s acceptable.
17 people found this helpful