🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 198+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Sterling Silver Jade Ring

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (198 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$16.25
$27.08
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Gorgeous vintage Sterling silver Jade Ring. Size 5

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy shipment
↩️
plain Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Sterling Silver Jade Ring

Gorgeous vintage Sterling silver Jade Ring. Size 5​

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 689099

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price: $27.08 USD

Sale Price: $16.25 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3162 reviews
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
After assorted use, the Vintage Sterling Silver Jade Ring works well enough so no complaints.
23 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptionally satisfied
Happy with how this Vintage Sterling Silver Jade Ring performs.
43 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright
5 months ago Β· Fresno, CA​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
magnificent product
So far, the Vintage Sterling Silver Jade Ring works well enough and it’s fine overall.
36 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding!
For the price, the Vintage Sterling Silver Jade Ring works fine so no complaints.​
33 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 days ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
After a few days, the Vintage Sterling Silver Jade Ring is practical and I don’t regret it.
11 people found this helpful