๐Ÿšš gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.5/5 from 756+ reviews
Electronics โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

Samsung Galaxy S6 Galaxy S3 Lot

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.5 out of 5 (756 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$14​
$23.33
Sale
โœ“ no-cost delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Phones dont work, for parts only.They turn On when charged but battery drains speedy.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
speedy distribution
โ†ฉ๏ธ
accessible Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Samsung Galaxy S6 Galaxy S3 Lot

Phones dont work, for parts only.
They turn On when charged but battery drains prompt.

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Electronics products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 648975

Category: Electronics > Cell Phones & Accessories > Other

Original Price: $23.33 USD

Sale Price: $14 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.5
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3195 reviews
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท San Francisco, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Five stars!
the Samsung Galaxy S6 Galaxy S3 Lot works well enough and it meets expectations.​
16 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Denver, CO

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Totally worth it
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Galaxy S3 Lot is practical for me.
11 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase 
2 months ago ยท Tucson, AZ
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
really pleased
To be fair, it is straightforward to use which feels reasonable.
3 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
solely what I wanted​
Satisfied overall.
37 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Tampa, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Simply remarkable
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Galaxy S3 Lot arrived as expected.
33 people found this helpful