🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 740+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5 (740 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30
$50
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

4 inches, various wear on the front. DOES NOT WORK.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy distribution
↩️
accessible Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera

4 inches, several wear on the front. DOES NOT WORK.

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 308443

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Cameras

Original Price: $50 USD

Sale Price: $30 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2983 reviews
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
I tried the 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera and it works as described.
26 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
treasure it!
From my experience, the 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera feels okay which is good enough. No setup issues.
44 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate it!
The 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera quality matches its price.
3 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 days ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
The 1960s Kodak Instamatic 104 Camera quality is nothing unexpected.
43 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
cherish love love!
So far, it is effortless to use so it’s acceptable.
50 people found this helpful